Friday, July 31, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Bye Bye Skinbook
In response to the many members who are against Skinbook's risky "Name and Shame" blog, the administrators offered the following:
Well, I just deleted my account.
In short, we (the founding members of Skinbook) are SICK of it. Seriously. Final-straw-type sick of it! To the point where everyday we hover the mouse pointer over the "delete this network" button.
Well, I just deleted my account.
Name and Shame
Skinbook has launched a "Name and Shame" blog in order to expose the "perverts, fakers and sex pests" who try and join the social network for nudists and naturists.
This is one of the worst ideas I've ever seen. I'm not even going to provide a link.
Not only does the blog violate just about every privacy issue possible by naming names with email and physical addresses, it actually offers to remove the names and photos in exchange for an apology. That's the definition of blackmail.
Take down your Name and Shame blog, Skinbook. Screening and filtering charlatans is enough; exposing them in this manner could potentially be criminal.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sGS5NeFTT5qWDNXNQdg-9YfOWtuuoH32CEd4jLMq6fmMrtkQ2coTYnUiSHUd7ExJM2Okec5xms6JS3-ZduE8Jz4obEtrmN4mTtZTvh7Kzdh08TPRP9Y36fguuj_oV1S_TsPzAFmb4u0FXyyLxDwmg6=s0-d)
This is one of the worst ideas I've ever seen. I'm not even going to provide a link.
Not only does the blog violate just about every privacy issue possible by naming names with email and physical addresses, it actually offers to remove the names and photos in exchange for an apology. That's the definition of blackmail.
Take down your Name and Shame blog, Skinbook. Screening and filtering charlatans is enough; exposing them in this manner could potentially be criminal.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Georgia Public Indecency Ordinance Likely Unconstitutional
Council members in Vienna, Georgia, have unanimously approved a new public indecency ordinance.
Attire documented in the ordinance as indecent includes the “saggin pants” style that is popular among young men. Also included are some blouses/tops worn by females. Basically, the ordinance prohibits the wearing of any attire in public places that exposes “private areas” of the body including the buttocks and breasts and male or female genital areas.I don't know if I've ever heard of a more restrictive public dress code. Such laws are almost always found to be unconstitutional as well as an abuse of power.
Get Over It
A reader made the following comment on my Nudist Photo of the Day blog:
But it is precisely because vintage nudist photos are so gender imbalanced that I started the Adam and Eve and Nudist Men blogs.
I've heard this critcism before. Some nudists and naturists, especially TNS members, hold themselves to a more elitist standard, to a Utopian vision where people of all ages, genders, races and sexual preference frolic in the fields without a care in the world.
Well nudism and naturism aren't that neat.
You want gender balance? Try starting with the vast majority of landed and non-landed clubs which struggle every day to attract more women. In Columbus, Ohio, local swims are about 5-to-1 men, sometimes greater. Most clubs have given up on the gender balance issue because they so desperately need members that they now accept single men. There are also quite a few "men only" naturist clubs and resorts - do you know of any "women only" groups?
You want racial balance? Try starting with the AANR and TNS publications which are show tons of pretty pink people engaging in naturist activities, but virtually no people of color. One can argue that nudist organizations are guilty of institutional racism since they make no effort to balance the ethnic and racial makup of their membership.
You want age balance? Try starting with the AANR and TNS publications which have all but phased out images of anyone under the age of 18. At Green Valley where I was one of over 200 nude people in the pool, there was only one child - a toddler in diapers. Children are rapidly disappearing from this "family-friendly" lifestyle, which is being threatened by sexed-up resorts like Caliente, and a society increasingly believing that any nude image of a child is somehow pornographic.
And naturists patronizing swinger clubs certainly doesn't add any credibility to the purist argument.
Personally I love the vintage nudist photos, despite the obvious gender imbalance. They're fun, kitschy, and often beautiful in their simplicity and playful innocence. They are visual evidence of a time gone by, lost to the sexual revolution, feminism, and other cultural shifts.
So "get over it."
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_snaXotRsTmiYtgqUM2IXZdArkvrSujR00Ir5IILrLo86RkLPhc2QHJzpEF7mfhJh69LWI3tTFQiqzyl26s8tsOiFDNV9Fmfnvw-WsreRKnfem7kIbzMEs6lMIcb3qCg5HhgbnzLBY5DZpWvlNXYOtg=s0-d)
You've been heavy on the women for the last week or so... Mix it up a bit.Artists and photographers have put the female form on a pedestal since the first cave drawings. One cannot go through any art museum without seeing more nudes of women than of men.
I know that there are probably more photos of women out there. And I know that you have a photo blog dedicated to the men and another dedicated to couples. I'd recommend using this blog to show more groups of mixed gender, which is a better sample of what being a nudist is all about.
But it is precisely because vintage nudist photos are so gender imbalanced that I started the Adam and Eve and Nudist Men blogs.
I've heard this critcism before. Some nudists and naturists, especially TNS members, hold themselves to a more elitist standard, to a Utopian vision where people of all ages, genders, races and sexual preference frolic in the fields without a care in the world.
Well nudism and naturism aren't that neat.
You want gender balance? Try starting with the vast majority of landed and non-landed clubs which struggle every day to attract more women. In Columbus, Ohio, local swims are about 5-to-1 men, sometimes greater. Most clubs have given up on the gender balance issue because they so desperately need members that they now accept single men. There are also quite a few "men only" naturist clubs and resorts - do you know of any "women only" groups?
You want racial balance? Try starting with the AANR and TNS publications which are show tons of pretty pink people engaging in naturist activities, but virtually no people of color. One can argue that nudist organizations are guilty of institutional racism since they make no effort to balance the ethnic and racial makup of their membership.
You want age balance? Try starting with the AANR and TNS publications which have all but phased out images of anyone under the age of 18. At Green Valley where I was one of over 200 nude people in the pool, there was only one child - a toddler in diapers. Children are rapidly disappearing from this "family-friendly" lifestyle, which is being threatened by sexed-up resorts like Caliente, and a society increasingly believing that any nude image of a child is somehow pornographic.
And naturists patronizing swinger clubs certainly doesn't add any credibility to the purist argument.
Personally I love the vintage nudist photos, despite the obvious gender imbalance. They're fun, kitschy, and often beautiful in their simplicity and playful innocence. They are visual evidence of a time gone by, lost to the sexual revolution, feminism, and other cultural shifts.
So "get over it."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)