I'm not sure what picture "Anna" is referring to, but my problem with this set is that one of the pictures (the one of the young couple walking away from the snack stand) seems to be voyeuristic in nature (as in without the knowledge or consent of the subjects), most likely taken from one of the websites that exploits nudism for entertainment. There is enough legitimate nudist photography out there (taken from official publications and the like) -- I don't see the need to use such material.
A bunch of us used to have a "game" "Where's Claudia?" (Sort of like "Where's Waldo?" except with a nudist. Usually because you could not opena copy of N magazine without seeing her.
The photo is the one where you had the lady and the guy sitting on lawn chairs with some kind of beverage in their hand. Behind them is a naked black guy in between two people who are wearing clothes.
Anna, shouldn't body be seen as a whole instead of seen as diferent parts, os sexual or non-sexual parts?
The way that you sit is also an social convention, such as wearing clothes. Look at the children, do they care about the way they are sitting, do they seen any sexual content in it, or they just sit the way they are comfortable with it?
Anna, shouldn't body be seen as a whole instead of seen as diferent parts, os sexual or non-sexual parts?
The way that you sit is also an social convention, such as wearing clothes. Look at the children, do they care about the way they are sitting, do they seen any sexual content in it, or they just sit the way they are comfortable with it?
9 comments:
What do you think of the leg position of the lady at the photo on the left?
She shouldn't even do such a leg position at a nudist venue, much less allow herself to be photographed doing it.
Then you'd really freak out when nudists bend over to pick something up.
if i had to guess, this picture would be from nudes a poppin. do you see the fully dressed guy in the background with the video camera!!!
I'm not sure what picture "Anna" is referring to, but my problem with this set is that one of the pictures (the one of the young couple walking away from the snack stand) seems to be voyeuristic in nature (as in without the knowledge or consent of the subjects), most likely taken from one of the websites that exploits nudism for entertainment. There is enough legitimate nudist photography out there (taken from official publications and the like) -- I don't see the need to use such material.
A bunch of us used to have a "game" "Where's Claudia?" (Sort of like "Where's Waldo?" except with a nudist. Usually because you could not opena copy of N magazine without seeing her.
She's even on these photos on Dec 13.
The photo is the one where you had the lady and the guy sitting on lawn chairs with some kind of beverage in their hand. Behind them is a naked black guy in between two people who are wearing clothes.
Anna, shouldn't body be seen as a whole instead of seen as diferent parts, os sexual or non-sexual parts?
The way that you sit is also an social convention, such as wearing clothes. Look at the children, do they care about the way they are sitting, do they seen any sexual content in it, or they just sit the way they are comfortable with it?
Anna, shouldn't body be seen as a whole instead of seen as diferent parts, os sexual or non-sexual parts?
The way that you sit is also an social convention, such as wearing clothes. Look at the children, do they care about the way they are sitting, do they seen any sexual content in it, or they just sit the way they are comfortable with it?
The leg position of the lady in the lawn chair isn't that much different from the lady lower down (in the picture lineup) on a beach near the water.
No problem.
Post a Comment