The definition is different for everybody. While I find human nudity wholesome and natural, there are many people with different opinions, varying from mild acceptance to total disgust. A fellow blogger over at Naked/Nudism has an essay entitled "
The Right Not to be Offended" which addresses part of the issue, but I feel that he misses the mark.
By quoting from the Bill of Rights, the blogger says that he cannot find any reference to a "right not to be offended", meaning that there seems to be in America a "prevailing notion" that people have the right to live free and unfettered by offensive things, and that sex and nudity seem to be the sole offenders.
This is not even close to being true. Society has ruled against many, many things that have been deemed to be offensive, such as dog poop, smoking, excessive noise, speeding, creating a disturbance, fireworks, and so on ad
infinitum.
There is a fine line in this society over what is decent and what is indecent, and it will always be so. As society changes so do public perceptions. It was once perfectly acceptable for people to swim naked, but in Victorian times the bathing suit was invented and it became the norm to be covered on the beach. It was once thought scandalous for a woman to show a bare ankle, and today there is no problem with women showing much, much more. Laws and ordinances are enacted by public demand - proposals are made, bills are voted, laws are created. In a representative republic such as we have today, it is generally the majority will of the people that decides what is offensive and what is not.
Concerning nudity, the overwhelming opinion of the American people has determined that it is indecent in public places. This opinion has been shaped by many years of societal give and take, and when you consider the fact that we are largely a religious society, it's no surprise. And don't tell me that we are a secular society today. Yes, we generally believe in the separation of church and state, but with most Americans believing in God and belonging to some organized religion, there is no way to completely separate the egg from the yolk.
And you know what? I like having a right to offend, and I don't mind being offended in turn. If you're able to censor your environment such that you never come across anything that offends you, be it sex, nudity, Sean Hannity or the religious right, you're not living in a free society.
This is essentially a non
sequitur. I have no difficulty coming across sex, nudity, Sean
Hannity or the religious right; all of these are ubiquitous.
When I come across things I'm offended by (and there are many), I simply ignore them. I change the channel, I tune them out, I walk away. Frankly, they're not worth the time and energy it takes to get upset over them. I'd only ask that anyone who's offended by nudity and nudism to do the same: support the spirit of the bill of rights and look away rather than try to censor us. Being offended once in a while is a small price to pay for freedom.
I'm offended by something every day, and this is true for every American. Society cannot and will not
eliminate all things deemed to be offensive, but it will attempt to curb and control activity determined to be offensive by the majority. The Bill of Rights does not guarantee the right to do or say anything you please (shouting "fire" in a crowded theatre is the classic example), the wording was designed to allow open
dissent without fear of reprisal from the government. It's unreasonable and naive to think that thousands of years of developing public perceptions of decency and indecency can be simply passed off with the phrase "look away" - it's much more complicated than that.
So don't expect public sex and nudity anytime soon. In the meantime, don't break your TV next time you throw something at the screen during
Hannity and
Colmes.