Thursday, March 15, 2007

The Horrors of Breastfeeding

There are some aspects of modern American society that continue to baffle me to the point where I just want to scream. Case in point the ongoing "war" between mothers and the protectors of public decency over a woman's right to breastfeed in public.

Never mind that study after study shows that a breastfed child is healthier and happier, not to mention the health benefits to the mother. Some people still just don't get it.

A Maryland attorney wrote an essay here about his opposition to mothers who breastfeed in public. Here is one unbelievable quote:
I once had a stranger seated next to me on an airplane ask me to help her breast-feed her child. When I recoiled in horror and asked the stewardess to move me to another seat both the woman with the child and the stewardess called me all kinds of names. Several passengers joined the fray on both sides. It was only after I threatened to sue everyone involved that the woman agreed to take her baby to the lavatory where she wouldn't bother anybody else. If airlines are going to allow this sort of thing, they should provide areas where it can be done in private without annoying other passengers.
Wow. At first I thought this had to be some sort of spoof, that nobody with a college education and a lick of sense could possibly have such an ignorant attitude, but the jerk is for real.

A woman who responded with an opinion column of her own also has some fallacious information. She said:
The "get over it" retorts from rabid breast-feeding advocates are wasteful frustration at changing a reality that is as old as nursing itself. They refuse to see that the problem is the breast, not the mother or child, that is the hurdle to get over. Its dual role as a sex organ and source of infant nourishment is too difficult for many -- men and woman -- to separate.
OK, but the breast is NOT a sex organ. It is fatty tissue that contains the mammary glands which produce milk for the sustenance of the young. If the breast of a woman is a sex organ, then breastfeeding would have to be considered a sexual act, which it is not. And the problem is not the breast itself - the problem is the people who look at a woman breastfeeding and see something sexual.

We are a breast obsessed culture. Hundreds of thousands of women have breast augmentation surgery every year and the numbers are growing fast. And with the re-introduction of silicone-based implants, there is no letup in sight.

A letter to the editor regarding the attorney's "horror" at breastfeeding adds fuel to the fire:
I am a mother who has raised two wonderful, healthy, successful children on the bottle from day one. I personally do not see breast-feeding as a beautiful thing. Maybe, just maybe, it would be better for you, your babies and me to find a quiet spot to let, as you would say, "nature take its course." My discomfort rate has nothing to do with my sex, age, education or narrow-mindedness. There's a time and place for everything, including breast- feeding, and I don't want to see it when traveling, in restaurants, or while walking through the mall.
If this is not "narrow-mindedness", I don't know what is. Whenever someone is asked to give a reason why breastfeeding in public is wrong, you will hear plenty of cliches, such as "there's a time and a place", "it's not decent", "it's immoral", etc., but you will never hear a real reason, a rational argument, or a valid point. The truth is that the proper time and place for breastfeeding a child is anytime and anywhere, and thankfully now many state laws agree.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

If I was on a plane I wouldn't even ask; a baby takes more priority than the 'moral' views or insecurities of a stranger and it's odd how those who have issues with breast feeding are males (compared to females). Our society has treated the breast as a a sex object, and some men can't get beyond this.

You can imagine how these men would be if they were married, and enjoyed a full sex life with their partner, and the women at some point had to breastfeed. Would they be turned off? Would they find it horrifying, or would they find it more perverted?

I question the state of mind of the males that you've quoted in your post (the lawyer).


I don't think a woman should ask anyone permission to breastfeed her child, because a baby, at the point of hunger is frantic, and distressed and the only reason I know this is because I've breastfed, and I'm not going to ask anyone's permission to do it just because their own psychological state is screwed that it associates a natural act with sex or porn, and I don't think women should ask either.

It's like women are being distanced from their bodies when people kick up a stink about breastfeeding. It's not enough that corporations, fashion designers and magazines do it each day, women have to cope with 'social'/moral groups.


Interesting thought provoking all the same, great post.

Unknown said...

OK, I'm a woman. I've never been blessed with kids, but my sister had four, all breastfed. Somehow, though, she managed to keep in mind that her breasts are PRIVATE PARTS, and kept herself covered even when breastfeeding in public. Obviously, different rules would apply at nudist resorts or beaches. I don’t consider those to be public venues. An airplane IS public! So unless it was an all nude flight, why was the mother right and the attorney wrong?

I'm baffled. How is there is even a discussion about this? I cannot fathom how this hubbub ever got started in the first place, when all you have to do is sling a baby blanket across your shoulder, for heaven's sake! It's a painfully simple solution to a silly problem! (I reiterate, I'm speaking as a non-nudist about breastfeeding in non-nude, public venues. This is a contentious issue even for those who prefer clothing, you know.)

OK, fine. There will always be a few cranks who are against even discreet public breastfeeding, but I am sure they represent the minority opinion. For this to work, we all must be willing to compromise in some way. Personally, I have to overlook the discomfort I feel when hearing sucking sounds coming from under the blanket. (In certain situations, it is decidedly distracting.)

I think most people are in my camp: I believe it cannot be debated that, medically speaking, breastfeeding IS absolutely the best choice for both mother and baby** (when physically possible). Period. I also believe it is neither required nor acceptable to publicly bare one or both nipples in order to accomplish the task. Public breastfeeding is not immoral, but publicly baring one's breasts is.

My sister made an art of discrete breastfeeding just a few weeks into the first baby. Most mothers do. I've seen it done successfully by many mothers for many years:

*Get baby into position...

*drape blanket across baby's head and mommy's shoulder...

*open clothing...

*commence nursing...

*finish nursing...

*close clothing...

*move blanket to opposite shoulder...

*place baby there for burping...

*cuddle!

There. Mission accomplished, without testing societal boundaries... or anti-nudity statutes!

C'mon, mommies. It's just a baby blanket. You have one right in your diaper bag. Is it really too much to ask that you make use of it? You have to accept that, whether it contains milk or not, a breast is a breast is a breast. The law and society define it as a private part, and it should remain covered in public. If it weren't private, women would be allowed to go topless at more than just nude beaches. Just keep it covered, ladies!

Oh, by the way, I wanted to point out to Anastasia that the original article quoted the attorney on the plane as saying: "I once had a stranger seated next to me on an airplane ask me to help her breastfeed her child." Note, the mother was not asking for his permission, but for his help. His assistance! From a total stranger! I can't imagine what she could have had in mind, but I believe that request was the root of the man's disgust (with which I fully sympathized). I don't think it had anything to do with him finding the act of breastfeeding itself to be morally offensive. Maybe that's just my interpretation, but it seems pretty obvious to me.

**NOTE: Just as there are extremists against any form of public breastfeeding, there are extremists against bottle feeding for any reason. It is wrong to castigate anyone for their choice in the matter. Every mother loves her baby, and does what she feels is right for her family. For some, it's breast, for other, it's bottle. Most women who bottle feed do so because they have some kind of difficulty with the breast, so please, don't judge unless you want to be judged in return!

Nudiarist said...

It needs to be pointed out that the baring of a female breast, including the nipple, for the purposes of breastfeeding, is now a protected woman's right under many state laws, and inevitably it will become the law everywhere. It is a contradiction to say that breastfeeding is wonderful on one hand, and then say that the showing of the breast is immoral on the other. Hiding a feeding child under a blanket only furthers the notion that something shameful is going on. Did you ever notice that people who argue against any public displays of breastfeeding never seem to offer even the slightest reason as to why the sight of a female nipple is harmful to anyone? They will say it's "immoral" or that the breasts are "private parts", but these are just opinions and have no bearing on reality, or the law.